that was cake.

http://www.foliomag.com/viewmedia.asp?prmMID=8270&prmID=1

i think that's just swell. i mean who knew actual change like this was still possible. i come from the world of publishing and i know that ads rule the magazine. just like money rules the world. maybe i haven't been following the case, but it seems like NOW, national organization of women, just decided to protest the sex trafficking ads in the backs of these newspapers/magazines and the publishers just decided, sure, we'll do without that revenue. but it's like they were trying to see how long they could get away with advertising prostitutes on their books before someone caught on. well, i'm sure it was a long and hard fight for NOW. maybe they can make some more changes, using this example as proof of their clout.